| UK Buell Enthusiasts Group https://www.ukbeg.com/forum/ |
|
| Running with or without baffles https://www.ukbeg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=7029 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Ash [ 11 Jun 2010 15:02 ] |
| Post subject: | Running with or without baffles |
2007 STT with a Remus/K&N filter - I like the sound (and little flame!) on the over run with no baffles in but will this lead to engine damage, burnt valves etc ... by riding without them .. ? There doesn't seam any noticeable difference in back pressure, mid range pull or performance etc just a lot more pop/bang on over run ... Opinions ... ? 
|
|
| Author: | Beef [ 11 Jun 2010 15:51 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Running with or without baffles |
I think you'll be fine-if taking the baffles out results in burnt out valves, I'd say it wasn't right anyway  
|
|
| Author: | Ash [ 11 Jun 2010 15:55 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Running with or without baffles |
I did wonder, loads here run with empty cans (tubers mainly) and dont seam to find any issues .. I'm wondering if the fuelling in the ECU might need some adjusting or whether it will do it its self |
|
| Author: | Beef [ 11 Jun 2010 15:59 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Running with or without baffles |
Id have thought it would but......... Fuel injection  
|
|
| Author: | mojomick [ 11 Jun 2010 21:09 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Running with or without baffles |
What are Baffles? 
|
|
| Author: | Jill Brown [ 11 Jun 2010 21:13 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Running with or without baffles |
Well, it's baffled me.... 
|
|
| Author: | Ash [ 11 Jun 2010 21:37 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Running with or without baffles |
mojomick wrote: What are Baffles? You were one of those I was referring too above
|
|
| Author: | Nutah [ 11 Jun 2010 21:41 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Running with or without baffles |
baffles = extra weight dude
|
|
| Author: | Ash [ 11 Jun 2010 21:45 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Running with or without baffles |
 
|
|
| Author: | fagin [ 12 Jun 2010 00:14 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Running with or without baffles |
no baffles. 
|
|
| Author: | jonnyboyrebel [ 12 Jun 2010 01:15 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Running with or without baffles |
I barely have a can on my bike and it rarely spits fire (ok it does when I give the biggun) but the rest of the time it behaves fine Ash. Mine is a trifle noisy though...... My Jardine RT-5 didn't come with a baffle?! |
|
| Author: | Ash [ 12 Jun 2010 08:57 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Running with or without baffles |
Baffles now in the shed, neighbours rudely awakened 
|
|
| Author: | jonnyboyrebel [ 12 Jun 2010 09:34 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Running with or without baffles |
|
|
|
| Author: | mr waff [ 13 Jun 2010 16:40 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Running with or without baffles |
Hi Ash I run my Remus with no baffles, but with a Buell race ECM no popping or banging on the overun. It could run too lean with the standard ECM/fuelling as they err on the lean side. use a fueller ie: remus poweriser or ecm spy. Pash? Gunter? |
|
| Author: | pash [ 13 Jun 2010 16:48 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Running with or without baffles |
Daywalker ran his XB on the dyno with a standard ECM and an O2 sensor up the exhaust, and his mixture was spot on (sure it was a mixture of the front and the rear and you don't really know if one was lean and one was rich). Oh yes, and his is a 9. If Ash wants to check at Moorespeed, we can put the UKBEG XB12 headers on and use my dual wideband O2 sensors with ECMSpy for Mono. Alternatively, when I get some time, I'll put a Remus on my Uly with the UKBEG XB12 headers and log some data. That will tell us what we want to know... |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC+01:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|